Raster3D (and gff2aplot too)
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Raster3D (and gff2aplot too)
- From: "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:58:47 -0300
- Message-id: <425FF2C7.email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0504091830150.30052@wr-linux02>
- References: <IEO54W$67FFCFC59C19FF9BDDD86656AEF01344@bol.com.br> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0504091830150.30052@wr-linux02>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Andreas Tille wrote:
> Perhaps providing a README.Debian might make sense - but not (...)
I made 2 README.Debian. One for raster3d and other for raster3d-doc.
They are basically explaining that raster3d-doc could be useful and that
the user will have to install raster3d in order to use some examples
from raster3d-doc. It also says that he might need ghostscript and
imagemagick to run some examples.
BTW, a README.Debian on raster3d and another one on raster3d-doc. Is it
It works OK with imagemagick present on testing and unstable (they are
the same version). I put it as recommends, since the main program from
Raster3D doesn't needs imagemagick.
The same for ghostscript. A recommends to gs-gpl (since gs is a dummy
package to gs-gpl). GS is only needed by two scripts, that aren't the
"core" of Raster3D.
raster3-doc also has a recommends on raster3d since to run the examples,
the user will need the programs from raster3d package.
I have patched upstream BUGS file, to (I think) the really important parts.
> /usr/share/doc/raster3d/changelog.Debian :
> All my remarks are no real show stoppers for an upload and can be
> fixed in future versions. But we need a "Closes: #<WNPP-bub-number>"
> You should list the PDF file in addition
> Moreover I have very often seen that the docs inside a xyz-doc package
> are installed into /usr/share/doc/xyz instead of /usr/share/doc/xyz-doc.
> This is a minor remark but I just want you to know that this might
> be interesting and you should perhaps ask or RTFM whether there are
> some best practices.
Yes. I was in doubt about that.
Asked on #debian-devel and #debian-mentors. Nobody answered... :-/
Then I download some packages source that were split in <package> and
They were installing all the documents under /usr/share/doc/package-doc
Because that I installed on the same way. I don't remember the name of
the packages, but I saw it on two packages.
> Moreover I would do a
> raster3d.html /usr/share/doc/raster3d-doc/html/index.html
> to make immediately clear with what file to start reading.
I created a link index.html -> raster3d.html, so people that are already
familiar with the webpages could open raster3d.html and new people will
see the index.html. I think this could help.
Well... I think that you are already getting angry with me! :-)
I hope that there is no more mistake on the packages.
Packages and stuff here:
And, finally, could you upload a new revision of the gff2aplot package?
I corrected some small things on the package (nothing important).
Thank you very much Andreas!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----