Re: question about leaving lzw and unknown-license code in source
- To: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Cc: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>, Roland Marcus Rutschmann <Rutschmann@gmx.de>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org, Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>, Erik Nolf <erik.nolf@rug.ac.be>
- Subject: Re: question about leaving lzw and unknown-license code in source
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 01:13:14 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 871y5p9ffp.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
- Mail-followup-to: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>, Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>, Roland Marcus Rutschmann <Rutschmann@gmx.de>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org, Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>, Erik Nolf <erik.nolf@rug.ac.be>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 13938736-F5A8-11D6-A46B-00039317863E@suespammers.org> (Anthony DeRobertis's message of "Mon, 11 Nov 2002 14:02:08 -0500")
- References: <[🔎] 13938736-F5A8-11D6-A46B-00039317863E@suespammers.org>
Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org> writes:
> Fortunately, the lzw patent expires this coming June.
There is more than one LZW patent on the world. :-(
Reply to: