[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#903597: mate-desktop: html tags in notification



Package: mate-desktop
Version: 1.18.0-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

looks like the battery capacity message is not displayed correctly. There are html tags within this message that shouldn't be there. I have attached you a screenshot.



   * What led up to the situation?
my well used hardware
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
seen a notification with html tags (see attatchment)
   * What was the outcome of this action?
thought that they shouldnt be there
   * What outcome did you expect instead?
a message without tags about how it is to be formated


thanks and keep up the good work

Cheers

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers oldoldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.14.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages mate-desktop depends on:
ii  hicolor-icon-theme        0.17-1
ii  libatk1.0-0               2.26.1-3
ii  libc6                     2.27-2
ii  libcairo-gobject2         1.15.10-1
ii  libcairo2                 1.15.10-1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0        2.36.11-1
ii  libglib2.0-0              2.56.1-2
ii  libgtk-3-0                3.22.29-3
ii  libmate-desktop-2-17      1.18.0-2
ii  libpango-1.0-0            1.40.14-1
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0       1.40.14-1
ii  libstartup-notification0  0.12-5
ii  libxrandr2                2:1.5.1-1
ii  mate-desktop-common       1.18.0-2

Versions of packages mate-desktop recommends:
ii  mate-user-guide  1.18.0-1

mate-desktop suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Attachment: Screenshot at 2018-07-11 18-57-49_.png
Description: PNG image


Reply to: