Bug#895000: atril always shows a stacktrace/crash from webkit displaying pdf files
Package: atril
Version: 1.20.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #895000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
I am able to reproduce this with any PDF exactly as described.
Every time the stack trace is printed to the console, another
line like this becomes visible in dmesg:
segfault at bbadbeef ip 00007fe2c127380c sp 00007fffbe792a90 error 6 in libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0.so.18.7.8[7fe2c0466000+1063000]
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing-debug
APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.15.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages atril depends on:
ii atril-common 1.20.0-1
ii dconf-gsettings-backend [gsettings-backend] 0.26.1-3
ii libatk1.0-0 2.28.1-1
ii libatrildocument3 1.20.0-1
ii libatrilview3 1.20.0-1
ii libc6 2.27-3
ii libcairo-gobject2 1.15.10-1
ii libcairo2 1.15.10-1
ii libcaja-extension1 1.20.0-2
ii libgail-3-0 3.22.29-2
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.36.11-2
ii libglib2.0-0 2.56.0-4
ii libgtk-3-0 3.22.29-2
ii libice6 2:1.0.9-2
ii libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-18 2.20.0-2
ii libpango-1.0-0 1.42.0-1
ii libpangocairo-1.0-0 1.42.0-1
ii libsecret-1-0 0.18.6-1
ii libsm6 2:1.2.2-1+b3
ii libsoup2.4-1 2.62.0-1
ii libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 2.20.0-2
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.5-1
ii libxml2 2.9.4+dfsg1-6.1
ii mate-desktop-common 1.20.0-1
ii shared-mime-info 1.9-2
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-5
Versions of packages atril recommends:
ii dbus-user-session [default-dbus-session-bus] 1.12.6-2
ii dbus-x11 [dbus-session-bus] 1.12.6-2
ii gvfs 1.36.0-1
Versions of packages atril suggests:
ii caja 1.20.0-2
ii poppler-data 0.4.8-2
pn unrar <none>
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQFGBAEBCgAwFiEEJwCMxdBfG24Y2trvfWFEpid5MHIFAlrIHgYSHGpzY290dEBw
b3N0ZW8ubmV0AAoJEH1hRKYneTBy6S0IAJFobQOELgxsGe8K72e0kNuX5S6B0q3Z
U3UROLrKugCi5hRVNgbBqqLjQvdppg3coVv6ktcEGgR20UUuuNeV83w5P4MbJR0V
zp+8oveJg/ZSHVsK0DlQoTlUaGouCBGKvwEp2tb3tI+QfBkpV7DBWu9fwUQcIONJ
4mLMB0QQaobAnK5Jrq2OK1Lirf/j/IN1Qkbd1Vb9JyjODcHVvNygUXCvWKYT1zDH
yEBUUSwD2EOoWQyjgrIX/LhJ+kd37hjHjDqEko6CDKLWPoCflbcr4D5SYgHAtb+x
H65i6o0WIJeQvoeKwgiZohgQiOteOhkRWTpemotfXYnbzuybZCIqZIQ=
=eIvx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: