El 24/06/25 a las 22:53, Santiago Ruano Rincón escribió: > El 24/06/25 a las 23:15, Andreas Beckmann escribió: > > On 6/24/25 19:46, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > > > I plan to contact directly the sponsor to study the impact of > > > (officially) stopping supporting nvidia-graphics-driver. But before > > > that, it would be helpful to know if a full version backport is > > > technically possible or not. Help with that will be very appreciated. > > > Any volunteers? > > > > A backport of 535.247.01-1~deb12u1 to bullseye should be rather trivial. > > Thanks for the info, this is useful. > > > Compared to 470.xx the ppc64el architecture will dropped since upstream no > > longer provides updated ppc64el binaries (this has also been done in > > bookworm). > > OK, that shouldn't be an issue. > > > It is not a 0-change backport due to Openssl 1.1 vs. OpenSSL 3 (the > > neccessary changes are already in 535.183.01-1~deb12u1~bpo11+1). > > While writing this email a bullseye test rebuild of an updated > > bullseye-backports branch completed successfully. I can provide builds for > > LTS (source and/or binary, all architectures), but not test them. > > That would be helpful. Before going on, and to avoid that you spend your > time for nothing, I will contact the impacted user, and will come back > to you. Does that make sense to you? Sorry for the delay. There is finally interest on having the supported-by-upstream version available on old Debian releases. Andreas, would it be possible for you to provide those source+binary packages for bullseye-security? Tobi and Ariel on the same thread have mentioned it would be possible for them to test them? Thank you all. Have a nice week-end, -- Santiago
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature