On Wed, 2025-07-30 at 05:21 +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > > Whilst on front desk this week, I am noticing 23 packages that are of > the status: > "Issues fixed in buster and bookworm but not in bullseye". > > In my opinion, this is problematic as those who will be upgrading from > buster -> bullseye will see it as a regression, as they'll now be > vulnerable once again. That basically is the same reason why we fix issues fixed in Bullseye in Bookworm. So, to me it makes absolute sense. Do you have a list of these packages? Regards, Daniel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part