Re: Test uploads for bookworm-security on debusine.debian.net
On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 01:26:32PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> Hello all,
Hi Santiago,
>...
> Currently, debusine.d.n helps to verify how a packages builds on
> different architectures, to run autopkgest (contrary to Salsa CI,
> debusine also includes autopkgtest for reverse dependencies), piuparts
> and lintian. You can read more about debusine and setup instructions
> at:
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebusineDebianNet
>
> After you have initially uploaded the packages to debusine (this can be
> done easily via dput(-ng)), once everything is OK and have the ACK from
> the security team, you can complete the upload providing debusine with a
> signed package. (Instructions for this last step will be found in the
> workflow created by the upload.)
>...
I have a general question about that:
A common situation[1] is that I don't know when preparing the package
whether it will be for pu or DSA.
The status quo is that I finish the package and send the debdiff for
review, and upload the package based on the reply from the security
team.
autopkgtest results would be desirable before humans review the debdiff,
should debusine bookworm or bookworm-security or both be used for that?
> Thanks in advance,
>
> -- Santiago
cu
Adrian
[1] last month I encountered that situation with 5 packages
Reply to: