Re: Remove runc from dla-needed

[Ola Lundqvist <ola@inguza.com>]

Hi

Yes I read that. But should we keep it in dla needed when it is to update a non lts release?

I thought the purpose of dla needed was for lts.

I understand the need to do forward porting but is dla needed the place for that?

 / Ola

Den mån 8 apr. 2024 13:33Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net> skrev:

Hi,

Please read the dla-needed.txt entry.
It says we should sync *bullseye*.

Cheers!
Sylvain

On 07/04/2024 23:47, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi fellow LTS contributors
>
> I was about to assign runc to myself but realized that it should not be
> in dla-needed.
> There is just one CVE to be fixed and that one is marked as no-dsa with
> note minor issue.
>
> I will therefore do the following.
> Change the no-dsa to postponed and remove runc from dla-needed.
>
> If anyone have any objections, please let me know.