On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 11:58:34AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > There has been a suggestion recently that all fixes should go through > unstable first. The claimed benefit is that this reduces the chance of > a regression. which I think is pretty important for security updates in general and the more important the older the supported suite is. in oldoldoldstable I really dont want to see experiments. also, given there are more fixup-DLAs than fixup-DSAs I think it's prudent to reduce the risk for regressions for DLAs. > In the discussion, it became clear that there is a > significant cost to this approach: substantial delays to LTS/ELTS > updates. quality work costs time. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ "Any fool can know. The point is to understand." - A. Einstein
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature