Re: Lintian changes for LTS development?
Hi Ola,
> My guess has been that we should not generally fix lintian warnings
> unless they are really important.
(Agree with this, of course.)
> So I assume quite a few of them could be removed. But maybe I'm wrong
> here.
That could work, although it would have the drawback of potentially
hiding the "really important" tags. I suspect we should only consider
removing/hiding tags if they were somehow introduced by the LTS update
process itself. Or, putting it another way: in the usual case, there
should probably be no difference between the Lintian output between
before and after applying a fix for relevant CVE(s)?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` lamby@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Reply to: