[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DLA-2743-1 amd64-microcode incomplete


On 23.08.21 10:47, Philipp Hahn wrote:
amd64-micocode for <https://www.debian.org/lts/security/2021/dla-2743> looks incomplete:

The source page <https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=amd64-microcode&searchon=sourcenames&suite=all&section=all> lists
stretch (admin): 3.20181128.1~deb9u1 [non-free] [security]

but the binary page <https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=all&section=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=amd64-microcode> only:
3.20160316.3: amd64 i386

This is confirmed by
curl -s http://security.debian.org/dists/stretch/updates/non-free/source/Sources.gz | gzip -dc | grep-dctrl -S amd64-microcode
Version: 3.20181128.1~deb9u1
curl -s http://security.debian.org/dists/stretch/updates/non-free/binary-amd64/Packages.gz | gzip -dc | grep-dctrl -S amd64-microcode
returns nothing.

Can you please have a look?

Similar issues already happened multiple times in the past as Debian autobuilders don't work as expected for non-free - see attached E-Mail. "non-free" is also listed as an exception on <https://wiki.debian.org/buildd> with instructions on how to autobuild things. I see
Autobuild: yes
in you package, but <https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#non-free-buildd> talks about
XS-Autobuild: yes

cc: non-free@builddd

The package setup seems to be correct. XS-Autobuild has been set in the source since 10 years ago[1] and it's allowlisted on the wanna-build master.

However only the main archive has non-free autobuilding thus far, security does not. (See wuiet:/srv/wanna-build/triggers/trigger.{debian,security})

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/hmh/intel-microcode/-/commit/3db8dcad239888ef010d2574eaa31a6d62ab9bd8

Reply to: