Hi Adrian
Thank you for this clarification. I obviously misread your note. I clarified it a little bit so maybe someone else does not make the same mistake as I did.
I removed my own note asking whether the package should be removed from this file or not.
I do not have a good solution to how we should handle this package in dla-needed.
If we keep it in dla-needed we will constantly have people like me who think that something should be done when it is not claimed. If we do not add it to the dla-needed file we may get someone triaging it and add it again, and then people do not know that you have already semi-claimed it already.
Should we write your name on the claim (because you do in practice have it claimed, but the problem here is that it will be a long claim, but that is not an issue if you keep adding notes) or should we write a fake claim like [semi-claimed pending buster backport] as claim name?
Cheers
// Ola