On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:59:54PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > In this particular case of missing web imports, one real issue is a > fragile workflow involving duplicate mail/web announcements due to lack > of automation/integration. sure, and my remarks are just to help with this sub-optimal workflow. > Still in this particular case, in our process the team coordinator cites > contributors by running a heuristic-based script, and forwarding it > verbatim to the team (and the whole Internet), so I believe this isn't a > case where the contributor would need to learn to cope, but a case where > public naming is error-prone and not appropriate. Hence why I replaced > the last-committer name with package+date for missing website imports. > > That being said, I think the current process for reporting stalled and > multiples claims is good enough as-is :) I don't understand why you think naming people and package names is ok for stalled updates and multiple claims but not for stalled announcements. could you please explain and make me understand? -- cheers, Holger ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C Dance like no one's watching. Encrypt like everyone is.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature