[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: zsh_5.0.7-5+deb8u1_amd64.changes REJECTED



Hi

Is this dependency on libpcap2 a new thing?

// Ola

On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 16:01, Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 03:08:58PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 04:57:19PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:18:45AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > Hi FTP team folks & LTS folks,
> > >
> > > The below rejection error message is confusing.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 02:30:20PM +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> > > >
> > > > zsh-static_5.0.7-5+deb8u1_amd64.deb: Built-Using refers to non-existing source package libcap2 (= 1:2.24-8)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > The package appears to be present:
> > >
> > > $ rmadison -u debian -a source -s oldoldstable libcap2
> > > libcap2    | 1:2.24-8      | oldoldstable | source
> > >
> > > Is this a transient condition?  Should I just upload again?  Or is there
> > > some other issue which I have missed?
> >
> > The source package is missing on the archive on security. So
> > ftp-master need to copy it over in this case because of the
> > Build-Using and the re-inject your rejected upload.
> >
> > For reference have a look at #823820.
> >
> Salvatore, thanks for the info.
>
> FTP Masters, can you confirm that appropriate steps are being taken to
> allo the upload of zsh 5.0.7-5+deb8u1?
>
Still nothing from the FTP masters.  The DLA has already been reserved
and others which come chronologically after have actually been
published.  This is no doubt going to confuse some users.  Can someone
please help get this sorted out so that the zsh upload can be processed?

Regards,

-Roberto

--
Roberto C. Sánchez



--
 --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ----
|  ola@inguza.com                    opal@debian.org            |
|  http://inguza.com/                Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
 ---------------------------------------------------------------


Reply to: