Re: (semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity

To: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>, Debian Extended LTS contributors <extended-lts-team@freexian.com>, debian-lts <debian-lts@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: (semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity
From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu27@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:44:58 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] ef38a862-c56e-d2fa-1142-1deebdc851ff@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4ab09ba6-e324-444b-b544-823a9f6ba2a5@www.fastmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 20200106102807.biadxpzroi242bzz@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] 4ab09ba6-e324-444b-b544-823a9f6ba2a5@www.fastmail.com>

On 06/01/2020 13:01, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Holger et al.,
> 
>> today I unclaimed for LTS:
>>
>> -ibus (Emilio)
> 
> I was working under the assumption that adding a note would reset the
> inactivity timer but this does not seem to be a case for at least
> this unclai (I see a "20191230: work is ongoing").
> 
> Can you clarify?

There was no such note for ibus. Maybe you could clarify which package you
meant. Your assumption is right afaik, so perhaps there was a bug somewhere or
you missed something.

Emilio

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: (semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity
  - From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu27@gmail.com>

References:
- (semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: (semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity
  - From: "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Please discontinue these SECURITY messages Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 2058-1] nss security update
Next by Date: Re: (semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity
Previous by thread: Re: (semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity
Next by thread: Re: (semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread