Re: (semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:39:26PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 10:31:23AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Is there perhaps a way of thinking about this that I am missing?
>
> honest question: do you think it's too much work to update the notes
> every other week?
>
I knew something was missing from my message :-)
I have no problem updating the notes weekly or so. That solution would
also fit well with the current system.
Would something as simple as this do the job?
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ python-urllib3 (Roberto C. Sánchez)
--
python2.7 (Roberto C. Sánchez)
NOTE: 20190321: Patches integrated for CVE-2018-14647, CVE-2019-5010, and CVE-2019-9636
- NOTE: 20190321: Waiting on upstream action for CVE-2019-9740 (roberto)
+ NOTE: 20190408: Waiting on upstream action for CVE-2019-9740 (roberto)
--
python3.4 (Roberto C. Sánchez)
NOTE: 20190321: Patches integrated for CVE-2018-14647 and CVE-2019-9636
That is, keep the same note just update the date.
The reason I asked the question the way I did initially was because I
had assumed (perhaps wrongly) that updating the note in this way might
not be considered acceptable.
In retrospect, I should have just given the example and then asked
directly instead of the rather abstract question/situation I tried to
explain at the first.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
Reply to: