[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Jessie update of miniupnpd?

On 5/28/19 3:37 PM, Yangfl wrote:
> Mike Gabriel <sunweaver@debian.org> 于2019年5月28日周二 下午8:26写道:
>> Dear maintainer(s),
>> The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
>> currently open in the Jessie version of miniupnpd:
>> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/miniupnpd
>> Would you like to take care of this yourself?
>> If yes, please follow the workflow we have defined here:
>> https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development
>> If that workflow is a burden to you, feel free to just prepare an
>> updated source package and send it to debian-lts@lists.debian.org
>> (via a debdiff, or with an URL pointing to the source package,
>> or even with a pointer to your packaging repository), and the members
>> of the LTS team will take care of the rest. Indicate clearly whether you
>> have tested the updated package or not.
>> If you don't want to take care of this update, it's not a problem, we
>> will do our best with your package. Just let us know whether you would
>> like to review and/or test the updated package before it gets released.
>> You can also opt-out from receiving future similar emails in your
>> answer and then the LTS Team will take care of miniupnpd updates
>> for the LTS releases.
>> Thank you very much.
>> Mike Gabriel,
>>   on behalf of the Debian LTS team.
>> PS: A member of the LTS team might start working on this update at
>> any point in time. You can verify whether someone is registered
>> on this update in this file:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/raw/master/data/dla-needed.txt
> Hi LTS team,
> I'm not familiar with the workflow, nor do I have much spare time
> these days. So I'm afraid I can't help at least for this update. You
> may ask zigo for his opinions.
> Thanks,
> Yangfl

I'm not familiar with the workflow either, and it's a single line patch,
so I guess it's best to just leave this work to the LTS team.


Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Reply to: