Re: (semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity
On 08/04/2019 14:32, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I've done this again and am considering (in general) to not write these mails
> anymore. Please speak up if you think these mails are useful (or could
> be made more useful.)
> Today I do feel it's useful to point out, that one should not merely
> reclaim the packages but also update the notes and explain why the
> package is claimed for long but not uploaded. Else it will be unclaimed
> again next week.
I think they are useful, though according to the wiki page they are part
of the front-desk duties.
Should we update it?