Re: jessie-updates gone
- To: debian-lts@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: jessie-updates gone
- From: Pierre Fourès <pierre.foures@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:29:23 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAFjJ7=MoEMEn4N=Si_8q3r1+MxxNh4Rs+qbRB8if1=hm1nf_Uw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <1553875325.11572.27.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- References: <q7ctno$3uua$1@blaine.gmane.org> <20190326103731.GN7274@smithers.snow-crash.org> <20190326142703.GD8706@fantomas.sk> <f1645ad2-ff89-7b08-9bea-d636b7d88ca0@debian.org> <C1C98FCD-BA96-456B-898D-CB59E7DE8575@gmail.com> <20190327115059.GA7357@fantomas.sk> <7f86086255b4b1ac28726e3c377d998a@mail.adam-barratt.org.uk> <20190329091101.GB30882@fantomas.sk> <CAFjJ7=M5p3DT-gzY5UC98sVT3kcP3vymVam+_H9S1FUmm4o2MA@mail.gmail.com> <1553875325.11572.27.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Thanks a lot Adam for the clarification.
Now that Jessie is in LTS and that jessie-updates/ is gone, does this
also mean there won't be any other updates to tzdata, clamav, or
similar (timely dependent's) packages ?
Or if still updated, where does we got them from ? I guess it's not
from security updates ?
Regards,
Pierre.
Le ven. 29 mars 2019 à 17:02, Adam D. Barratt
<adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> a écrit :
>
> On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 11:13 +0100, Pierre Fourès wrote:
> > The way I understand it, but I asked for clarification and
> > confirmation in my previous message [1], is that all « updates » goes
> > into -proposed-updates/, but the one who need to be quickly applied
> > into the distribution (but aren't security updates) are duplicated
> > from -proposed-updates/ into -updates/. Theses are the updates who
> > can't wait and must be applied between the point releases. Then, when
> > point releases occurs, all packages in -proposed-updates/ moves into
> > the stable repository of the distribution. They are automatically
> > removed from -proposed-updates/. This isn't true for the -updates/
> > repository as it requires manual pruning. Nonetheless, all packages
> > in
> > -updates/ went into the stable repository (from the -proposed-updates
> > they originated from) when the point-release occurred. So nothing is
> > lost. But is that right ?
>
> Yes - see https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/03/msg000
> 10.html , linked from every post to the debian-stable-announce list.
> (There will probably be a better URL somewhere on release.d.o once
> someone finds sufficient tuits to actually make it.)
>
> The removal of packages from p-u after adding them to stable is part of
> the actions performed by ftp-master during the point release (easily
> done as the package sets are the same). Technically, it is possible for
> an update from -updates / p-u to not be included in a point release,
> but that will usually be due to a regression being found before the
> point release, and in such cases there will likely be a follow-up
> update.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
>
Reply to: