On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 15:23 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Ah you are right, I was fooled by the mentioning of backports. Please > ignore me :). I was fooled too because of the bpo bit in the binary package name. Running a stretch kernel in jessie seems feasible for now so that's what I'm investigating but a newer 4.9 in jessie should be really great. If there is anything I can do to help with this, please let me know. Thanks, -- -- arthur - adejong@debian.org - https://people.debian.org/~adejong --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part