Re: finding packages after no-dsa
On 2018-04-11 15:27:33, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Note that the script does *not* detect `postponed` at all right now,
> which means postponed issues are in a state worse than `no-dsa` right
> now: they just go off the radar completely.
Okay, nevermind: postponed comes out as "nodsa" in the JSON dump, so we
do the right thing there. Still, I guess the underlying question remains
overall: do we want to depend on the main security team to followup on
those issues?
--
Arguing for surveillance because you have nothing to hide is no
different than making the claim, "I don't care about freedom of speech
because I have nothing to say."
- Edward Snowden
Reply to: