[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: wheezy-security (LTS) libclamav7's version is newer than jessie's



> > On Thu, 03 May 2018, Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
> > > Probably that a downgrade of the clamav suite would solve the problem; however
> > > there is something wrong in the coherency between wheezy LTS and jessie, don't
> > > you think?

> El 04/05/18 a las 09:20, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> > A newer version is already targeted to jessie (0.100.0+dfsg-0+deb8u1) but
> > it's sitting in jessie-proposed-updates and will only be in the main
> > repository after the next (final?) point release.

On 04.05.18 09:42, Santiago R.R. wrote:
> Just FTR, 0.99.4+dfsg-1+deb8u1 was also in proposed updates:
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/937695/accepted-clamav-0994dfsg-1deb8u1-source-all-into-oldstable-proposed-updates-oldstable-new-oldstable-proposed-updates/

El 04/05/18 a las 12:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas escribió:
where is it now then?

On 04.05.18 15:16, Santiago R.R. wrote:
I think it was also on proposed updates. changes files are still there:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/oldstable-proposed-updates/clamav_0.99.4+dfsg-1+deb8u1_all.changes

I'm sorry, I don't hive enough time to test those :(

I have upgraded one of machines noticing this - not a big issue, but I
wondered than new version hasn't been uploaded to jessie for such time.

It seems I didn't fully understand the mail that Moritz sent in March,
about avoiding to break upgrades. Really sorry for that! I am
documenting more explicitly how to handle clamav in LTS, according to
the comments in his recent mail.

as I said, no big problem - I have 0.99.4 with one library dependency from
wheezy installed now on a jessie machine.

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted,
then used against you.
Reply to: