[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Wheezy update of kildclient?



On 16-12-2017 14:44, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Thank you. I have uploaded this and announced it as DLA-1210-1. Thank you
> very much for your timely assistance for this issue.

Unfortunately those packages FTBS due to a missing build dependency.

The fix is very simple:

--- kildclient-2.11.1/debian/changelog  2017-12-16 11:56:43.000000000 -0200
+++ kildclient-2.11.1/debian/changelog  2017-12-17 08:13:19.000000000 -0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+kildclient (2.11.1-1+deb7u2) wheezy-security; urgency=high
+
+  * Added build-dependency on python to fix FTBS due to the need to run
+    gtk-builder-convert during build time.
+
+ -- Eduardo M Kalinowski <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br>  Sun, 17 Dec 2017
08:13:16 -0200
+
 kildclient (2.11.1-1+deb7u1) wheezy-security; urgency=high
 
   * Fix for CVE-2017-17511. New dependency 'gvfs' required in order to use
diff -Nru kildclient-2.11.1/debian/control kildclient-2.11.1/debian/control
--- kildclient-2.11.1/debian/control    2017-12-16 11:44:18.000000000 -0200
+++ kildclient-2.11.1/debian/control    2017-12-17 08:11:54.000000000 -0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: games
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Eduardo M Kalinowski <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8), autotools-dev, libglib2.0-dev (>=
2.14.0), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.18.0), libperl-dev (>= 5.10.0), gettext (>=
0.14.5), libgtkspell-dev, libgnutls-dev (>= 2.2.0), zlib1g-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8), autotools-dev, libglib2.0-dev (>=
2.14.0), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.18.0), libperl-dev (>= 5.10.0), gettext (>=
0.14.5), libgtkspell-dev, libgnutls-dev (>= 2.2.0), zlib1g-dev, python
 Standards-Version: 3.9.2
 Homepage: http://kildclient.sf.net
 Vcs-Browser:
http://kildclient.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/kildclient/trunk/debian/

And there's a new version at
    dget https://www.kildclient.org/debian/kildclient_2.11.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

-- 
It's later than you think.

Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
eduardo@kalinowski.com.br


Reply to: