On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 16:52 +0100, Martin Meredith wrote: [...] > As rar is a binary only package, it's likely to cause issues as it'll > be linked against newer libraries, and the libc link means it can't be > redistributed as statically linked. [...] I don't know why you're continuing to generalise from one instance to the indefinite future of rar. It's not that difficult for proprietary software vendors to build on an old distribution to ensure wide binary compatibility, and RARLAB appears to do so now. Based on the current (unstable) binary's symbol versions, it appears that wheezy is new enough to run it. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Never put off till tomorrow what you can avoid all together.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part