[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Wheezy update of icedove?



Hi Carsten,
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:05:38PM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Am 15.10.2017 um 23:24 schrieb Guido Günther:
> > Hi Carsten,
> > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 09:46:15PM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> >> Hello Ola,
> >>
> >> Am 15.10.2017 um 13:59 schrieb Ola Lundqvist:
> >>> Sounds good! I have updated dla-needed.txt now.
> >>
> >> I uploaded all thunderbird related packages within a new source package
> >> named thunderbird to NEW on Friday last week. The upload will be
> >> processed by the ftp-masters soon hopefully.
> >> The binary packages haven't changed, expect the version bump to 52.4.0
> >> and the usual small adaptations.
> >> Once the package is accepted I will push my local modifications to
> >> Alioth. If Guido is requesting some earlier access to 52.4.0 I can push
> >> the data before, but I'd prefer to push this all in one go.
> > 
> > Why not tag nd push to git right away? The version is used now anyway
> > even if it should get rejected.
> 
> Right.
> As Chris due a misunderstanding rejected my second upload of
> src:thunderbird I've re-uploaded all now again to NEW with only some
> additional added bug reports that should be closed by this version and
> small modifications of README.source.
> I also pushed all trees and tags to Alioth right now after I got the
> message from DAK.
> 
> On Alioth I moved the folder icedove.git to thunderbird.git and added
> also a symlink from icedove.git to the moved folder. So no matter what
> people are using for getting access to the git tree, they will get it
> under both names.

Thanks. Looks good here on Wheezy. Any idea when the versions for Jessie
and Stretch will be done? Wheezy was a straight rebuild of your work so
Jessie and Stretch should be the same. I'd like to avoid having a newer
version in Wheezy for too long. Since there's not even a MFSA for
Thunderbird yet I assume there are no really critical issues.

Cheers,
 -- Guido


Reply to: