Re: CVE-2016-6131 binutils, gdb, valgrind etc.
Bálint Réczey <balint@balintreczey.hu> writes:
>> I disagree. Perfect is the enemy of good. We have inconsistances in many
>> places too.
>>
>> Brians work was useful and should not be lost. It's good to close
>> "minor" security holes.
>
> I agree. Sometimes exploiting a combination of "minor" issues can be
> combined to allow more severe attacks. If the fixes are safe, I think they
> should be released.
I have a version available for testing:
https://people.debian.org/~bam/debian/pool/main/b/binutils/
--
Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Reply to:
- References:
- CVE-2016-6131 binutils, gdb, valgrind etc.
- From: Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>
- Re: CVE-2016-6131 binutils, gdb, valgrind etc.
- From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
- Re: CVE-2016-6131 binutils, gdb, valgrind etc.
- From: Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>
- Re: CVE-2016-6131 binutils, gdb, valgrind etc.
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: CVE-2016-6131 binutils, gdb, valgrind etc.
- From: Bálint Réczey <balint@balintreczey.hu>