Re: wheezy-security to wheezy-lts transition
- To: Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>, Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>, "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-lts@lists.debian.org, team@security.debian.org, ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org
- Subject: Re: wheezy-security to wheezy-lts transition
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:56:00 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20160223085600.GA3462@home.ouaza.com>
- Mail-followup-to: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>, Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>, Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>, "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-lts@lists.debian.org, team@security.debian.org, ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20160223073513.GA3226@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
- References: <[🔎] 1455978447.2574.48.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk> <[🔎] 20160222174220.GB2486@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org> <[🔎] 20160222222848.GA2880@pisco.westfalen.local> <[🔎] 20160223073513.GA3226@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=prep-wheezy-lts;users=debian-lts@lists.debian.org
> >
> > While these two are long-standing enhancement bugs which would make
> > the security team work much easier, they are unrelated to the plan
> > outlined above.
>
> I'm confused now. Arent these two bugs requirements to implement
> 1) and 3) from Raphael's BoF summary:
>
> 1/ the ftpmasters would reconfigure the suite to drop the "policy queue"
> in front of the repositories so that uploads are immediately accepted
> exactly like the current squeeze-lts repository (Ansgar told us this
> was easy to do)
> This solves problems 4 and 1 because LTS members no longer need shell
> access if there is "approval" step in the workflow.
>
> 3/ the ftpmasters will fix dak to also send the ACCEPTED mails to the
> person who signed the upload (this was already part of their plans
> even before this discussion, this now gives them one reason more
> to actually do it before the Wheezy LTS period start, aka in February
> 2016)
So #796784 is related to 3 but #796095 is not really related to 1 (except
maybe as a possible regression that we would like to avoid but that is
only barely relevant for LTS as we had very few DM uploads in squeeze-lts
AFAIK).
As I wrote in my notes, Ansgar told us that the configuration change
was easy and I thus expect that it does not need any preparation work.
But it would be nice to see #796784 fixed now that there's a working
patch...
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
Reply to: