Re: Bug#840691: ghostscript and evince/libspectre problem
- To: Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org>
- Cc: 840691@bugs.debian.org, Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com>, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>, Debian Security Team <team@security.debian.org>, debian-lts@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#840691: ghostscript and evince/libspectre problem
- From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:48:46 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20161028044846.GB21506@lorien.valinor.li>
- Mail-followup-to: Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org>, 840691@bugs.debian.org, Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com>, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>, Debian Security Team <team@security.debian.org>, debian-lts@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20161027234301.9f6c4cba9c5b272a428685e8@paranoici.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20161027030954.GC14240@miami.connexer.com> <[🔎] 20161027065439.GA6772@inutil.org> <[🔎] 20161027103143.GF14240@miami.connexer.com> <[🔎] 20161027103516.GA12383@inutil.org> <[🔎] 20161027104012.GG14240@miami.connexer.com> <[🔎] 20161027105356.GA27238@lorien.valinor.li> <[🔎] 20161027111210.GA6844@lorien.valinor.li> <[🔎] 20161027135002.GB16943@miami.connexer.com> <[🔎] 20161027161720.ciwet3qpg7lrklf4@eldamar.local> <[🔎] 20161027234301.9f6c4cba9c5b272a428685e8@paranoici.org>
Hi Francesco,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:43:01PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:17:20 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> [...]
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > Is your plan to release this as a -2 regression update to the previous
> > > DSA? I assume that is what you plan to do, but I wanted to confirm to
> > > be certain.
> >
> > Yes exactly, that's the plan. I would still like to hear Francesco's
> > feedback before proceeding with a regression update.
>
> I would love to help, but, as I said, I am unfortunately swamped:
> I cannot promise any fast feedback for the time being.
> Maybe I'll find some time for a test during the week-end, but this is
> not a promise! :-(
Don't worry. I just wanted to be extra-sure. But I'm now confident
that should be the needed change. After some testing on my workplace
machine as well I will do the regression update (today or tomorrow
latest, unless some other problem arise).
Regards,
Salvatore
Reply to: