Re: version number when packaging a new upstream release

To: Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@orangeseeds.org>
Cc: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com>, debian-lts@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: version number when packaging a new upstream release
From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 17:21:41 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20161003172141.GA4171@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87ponh9xfk.fsf@angela.anarc.at>
References: <[🔎] 20161003162928.53jdgf3v6hbjxnrp@hle.local> <[🔎] 20161003163324.GC32183@connexer.com> <[🔎] 87ponh9xfk.fsf@angela.anarc.at>

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 01:03:59PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I would say that -0+deb7u1 is a little unusual.
 
Agreed.

I'd suggest to use 6:0.8.18-1+deb7u3 because it's the third update of
that package within Debian 7.


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: version number when packaging a new upstream release
  - From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

References:
- version number when packaging a new upstream release
  - From: Hugo Lefeuvre <hle@debian.org>
- Re: version number when packaging a new upstream release
  - From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com>
- Re: version number when packaging a new upstream release
  - From: Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@orangeseeds.org>

Prev by Date: Re: version number when packaging a new upstream release
Next by Date: Re: version number when packaging a new upstream release
Previous by thread: Re: version number when packaging a new upstream release
Next by thread: Re: version number when packaging a new upstream release
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread