[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Wheezy update of libtomcrypt?

Hi Bálint,

Am 07.09.2016 um 00:21 schrieb Bálint Réczey:
> 2016-09-04 17:51 GMT+02:00 Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@debian.org>:
>> Thanks for your work on LTS.
>> Time does not permit me to do any of this work myself.
>> Please go ahead and make any changes as you see fit, there’s no need for my
>> review.
> Thank you for your quick answer.

First, thanks for taking care of communication with the maintainer as
part of your frontdesk duty.

> I (on behalf of the LTS Team since I'm responsible for frontdesk now) take your
> answer as covering all future security updates for releases in LTS period
> thus we won't contact you for each CVE.

Is there a place where we document the status quo of what maintainers do
prefer regarding LTS updates of their packages? I'm not aware of such a
document and I already wondered about it earlier.

For now, I search the debian-lts list archives to find out about
possible earlier statements by the maintainer(s).


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: