Re: Wheezy update of ruby-eventmachine?
2016-07-01 10:03 GMT+02:00 Christian Hofstaedtler <email@example.com>:
> * Balint Reczey <firstname.lastname@example.org> [160630 00:20]:
>> >>> I plan updating Jessie's version through jessie-proposed-updates, since
>> >>> the issue is marked as no-DSA.
>> >> This can probably still go through debian-security?
>> > I'll ask them, showing the proposed diff.
>> I asked, but here is no clear new decision regarding handling the issue
>> in Jessie.
> Jessie has the exact same issue, right?
Yes, with a slightly different set of patches to fix it.
Security Team still prefers the package to go through proposed-updates
which I will initiate soon after a last set of testing in Jessie.
>> While reading all the bug reports related to the crash I noticed that
>> the fix introduced a memory leak which is fixed in successive commits.
> Right, I knew about that but already had forgotten again.
>> I have added them to the update growing it significantly, but at least
>> we don't introduce a regression with the fix.
>> Please see the diff attached and also in the git repository as separate
> Wow that's a ton of patches on top. Look at least logically
> consistent to me.
> ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler <email@example.com>
> : :' : Debian Developer
> `. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03