Re: Iceweasel 45 for Wheezy-LTS
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:29:22PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 07:34:29PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> > I'm currently looking into building icedove 45 for Wheezy-LTS. I wonder
> > if I should do the same for Iceweasel or if you intend to keep
> > maintaining Iceweasel in LTS yourself?
>
> I don't know yet. The last message in bug 815006 makes me think it might
> be better to avoid the rename to Firefox in stable, so depending on the
> outcome of that, continuing to support oldstable may or may not be low
> overhead.
FWIW, I don't consider "adding new binary packages will prevent people
from upgrading a valid argument", we're often adding new binary packages
in a stable release already (e.g. kernel updates).
Cheers,
Moritz
Reply to: