[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Unsupported packages for Wheezy LTS



On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:07:17AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2016-05-12 10:00:24, Guido Günther wrote:
> >> qemu and qemu-kvm were triaged as unsupported for CVE-2016-3712, but I
> >> think Guido is studying how to support virtualisation related packages,
> >> and maybe we should wait for his evaluation.
> >
> > I had zero feedback on supporting qemu so I'd propose to drop it. We can
> > keep libvirt in the current version if we don't update qemu and it seems
> > to be in use in Wheezy quiet a bit (and dropping it would kill of quiet
> > some programs due to the dependency chain) so I'd propose to keep it.
> 
> Regarding qemu, keep in mind it's an integral part of Xen, specifically
> the HVM bits, if i'm not mistaken.
> 
> So dropping qemu support there means dropping *parts* of the Xen support
> as well.
> 
> I must say I'd be glad to do that because backporting those bits in xen
> was specially painful, but it might give users a false sense of security
> to say that Xen is supported, but only partially. The frontier there is
> not always clear to me.
> 
> I would rather see qemu supported, in other words. But the version in
> wheezy is really old, and in xen/wheezy even more so.

AFAIK Xen in Wheezy is using the version shipped with Xen itself and we
have gathered extra support for this so dropping QEMU/KVM in Wheezy
shouldn't have any negative effects on Xen.

Cheers,
 -- Guido


Reply to: