On Monday, April 25, 2016 02:07:01 AM Luca Filipozzi wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:55:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Do you have some concrete suggestions? > > Decrease the separation by moving the funds management into Debian proper > (via a TO like SPI) and move to a bounty model for working on LTS. Make > sure we're transparent with our language regarding Debian being produced by > volunteers (eg: "The Debian Project consists of volunteers, and our > products are developed entirely by volunteers." on ) by commenting on > how bounties are available (or something). Consider making LTS management > a delegated team. > > OR > > Increase the separation by removing the fundraising statements / links from > the LTS pages previously mentioned, making Freexian just another > consultancy listed on the consultancy pages. > > None of this is meant to diminish or tarnish the very significant > contribution that you or Freexian are making, which are both extensive and > impressive. I'm seeking greater definition of the role and the language > used. > > : https://www.debian.org/devel/join/ Any suggestions on how to get that done in the next two days before wheezy-lts starts? It might be a bit more practical to defer the idea of completely changing the LTS program to a moment when there's a bit more time (maybe Debconf). So far, I don't think anyone has specifically objected to the addition of armel/armhf. Scott K
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.