[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Non-security uploads for wheezy-lts

On Wednesday, March 02, 2016 02:09:28 PM Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 01.03.2016 um 15:45 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> > I understand that the plan is not to create a separate package suite for
> > Wheezy as was done for Squeeze and to upload to wheezy-security instead.
> > How
> > are uploads that aren't strictly security uploads going to be handled?
> > 
> > Specifically, I'm wondering what to do about clamav since we've been
> > uploading
> > new version as stable updates, not via -security.
> I think we should use wheezy-security for everything LTS related be it
> security or non-security updates. Otherwise we would need to create a
> special suite for such updates and this would be rather confusing for
> LTS users.

I think that makes sense, but we need to make it clear to users then that what 
wheezy-security is for will change slightly when it transitions to LTS.  
Whatever we do, I'd like it decided before we start.

Scott K

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: