On Wednesday, March 02, 2016 02:09:28 PM Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 01.03.2016 um 15:45 schrieb Scott Kitterman: > > I understand that the plan is not to create a separate package suite for > > Wheezy as was done for Squeeze and to upload to wheezy-security instead. > > How > > are uploads that aren't strictly security uploads going to be handled? > > > > Specifically, I'm wondering what to do about clamav since we've been > > uploading > > new version as stable updates, not via -security. > > I think we should use wheezy-security for everything LTS related be it > security or non-security updates. Otherwise we would need to create a > special suite for such updates and this would be rather confusing for > LTS users. I think that makes sense, but we need to make it clear to users then that what wheezy-security is for will change slightly when it transitions to LTS. Whatever we do, I'd like it decided before we start. Scott K
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.