Re: Looking for issues affecting wheezy but fixed in squeeze
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 02:28:02PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 07:27:20PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 02:22:22PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > now that Wheezy LTS is approaching I wondered what would be the best
> > > places to help out fixing issues in Wheezy so that upgrading from
> > > Squeeze to Wheezy would not introduce new security issues.
> > >
> > > Therefore I added bin/lts-needs-forward-port.py (based on
> > > lts-cve-triage.py) that lists issues fixed in Squeeze that are unfixed
> > > or marked no-dsa in wheezy. O.k. to apply?
> >
> > That should also parse next-oldstable-point-update.txt, since several of
> > those are likely scheduled for the next whezy point release.
>
> Good point - I didn't even know about that file. New version
> attached.
>
> The CVE-<number>-XXXX issues in are problematic since they're not unique
> so we have some fuzziness there until the issues get updated.
>
> Am I reading the SVN logs correctly that they are currently hand
> maintained? If so should one add user tags when filing bugs about this
> to release.debian.org so it gets easier to track.
Pushed now. I'm still happy about any comments so we can improve this
further iff needed.
Cheers,
-- Guido
Reply to: