Re: no-dsa vs. end-of-life

[Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>]

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:08:24PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> I see many packages marked:
> 
> 	[squeeze] - foo <no-dsa> (not supported in Squeeze LTS)
> 
> shouldn't that be
> 
>        	[squeeze] - foo <end-of-life> (not supported in Squeeze LTS)
> 
> since no-dsa implies that the bug migh be fixed eventually in a later
> update?

One thing I came across as well:

If it affects a package that _is_ supported (e.g. linux-2.6) but it
affects a part that is unsupported in squeeze-lts (e.g. KVM or XEN) than

    no-dsa

is correct.

Cheers,
 -- Guido