Re: Using the same nss in all suites

To: Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Cc: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>, Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>, team@security.debian.org, debian-lts@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Using the same nss in all suites
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:00:31 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87r3i2j31s.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20151231105553.GA3112@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org> ("Guido \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?G\=FCnther\=22's\?\= message of "Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:55:53 +0100")
References: <20151105072547.GA4006@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org> <20151105073056.GA29179@glandium.org> <87y4ecgqrw.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20151106162215.GB9689@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org> <87d1uyuz04.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <[🔎] 20151214170433.GA25204@inutil.org> <[🔎] 20151231105553.GA3112@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>

* Guido Günther:

> One thing though is that we don't have a DSA for announcing the new
> nss version in the point release but we don't have this for other
> packages either. Did this turn out to be problematic for other packages
> in the past that switch to new version in a point release?

I don't recall any issues.  The only corner cases I'm aware of is that
a security update in a point release introduced a regression, which we
then had to correct in a DSA.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Using the same nss in all suites
  - From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
- Re: Using the same nss in all suites
  - From: Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Using the same nss in all suites
Next by Date: Re: Using the same nss in all suites
Previous by thread: Re: Using the same nss in all suites
Next by thread: Re: Using the same nss in all suites
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread