Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2015, 17:44 +0100 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > > These need to be discussed, since they will be a significant > > time drain (e.g. are they in the sponsors's interests?). They > > are supportable, but it will take a lot of work and sometimes > > special domain knowledge: [snip] > > qemu > > qemu-kvm [snip] > > libvirt [snip] > Nobody commented here but I believe that we should aim to support > them. Then let me comment... > Except vlc, they are all used by some of the current sponsors (even > though > they are not currently supported in squeeze). Since I don't have a current package list on file, let me explicitly mention that I consider these packages to be important for us. Yet we could in theory live with backports of newer versions, as I assume the problem is that these are packages that are not supported upstream. But I'm not sure how much that would buy, since the versions of libvirt in sid and experimental are still rather old compared to current versions upstream. Note that testing them will be quite a hassle. I'm not saying we couldn't help, but I am saying that it would involve securing dedicated infrastructure and applying lots of configuration changes to do meaningful tests. Something that could take us something in the order of weeks for any test candidate. Thank you! David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part