Hi Holger, On Fr 03 Jul 2015 12:48:06 CEST, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi, On Freitag, 3. Juli 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote:The only way I can think of in terms of making this more fool proof, I guess, is by rejecting mails to debian-lts-announce if o a used DLA has not been reserved via the secure-testing SVN repo o the DLA has been reserved in the SVN repo, but for another packagethere is another way, which is probably easier to implement: parse debian-lts- announce mails and automatically add those DLAs to svn if that hasnt been donealready.
Yeah, I thought of this approach, as well...It will not always succeed, though, as there can be (normally is) a delay between running bin/genDLA and actually sending the DLA mail.
My delays normally are: o write up a nice announcement text o possibly have lunch break inbetween o answer someone's phone or deal with people coming into my officeIn the meantime, someone else may have run bin/genDLA as well and actually committed the DLA number (I had that once already with Santiago).
I guess we can capture something like 80% of the cases (which is good already) by auto-committing DLA's that come in via the d-l-a list, but for a 100% fix-up, we may need to bounce mails, it feels.
Though, I am not fully sure here, just lacking imagination here. ;-) Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
Attachment:
pgpZiP6_EauvH.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur