Re: How to deal with wireshark CVE affecting Squeeze

To: debian-lts@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How to deal with wireshark CVE affecting Squeeze
From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:05:45 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 201504141505.46779.holger@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAK0OdpwzGHpJp7cevXD4zEa3UyxmkD5y8MVy5Fys6H39wYfBLA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 20150410215944.GA22236@home.ouaza.com> <[🔎] 201504141447.47260.holger@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] CAK0OdpwzGHpJp7cevXD4zEa3UyxmkD5y8MVy5Fys6H39wYfBLA@mail.gmail.com>

On Dienstag, 14. April 2015, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> squeeze-lts, both in *.changes and *.changelog.
> The binary package names changed quite a lot so I think entering NEW
> was reasonable.

ah. makes sense :)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to:

References:
- How to deal with wireshark CVE affecting Squeeze
  - From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: How to deal with wireshark CVE affecting Squeeze
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: How to deal with wireshark CVE affecting Squeeze
  - From: Bálint Réczey <balint@balintreczey.hu>

Prev by Date: Re: How to deal with wireshark CVE affecting Squeeze
Next by Date: Re: Draft for a LTS press release
Previous by thread: Re: How to deal with wireshark CVE affecting Squeeze
Next by thread: Re: How to deal with wireshark CVE affecting Squeeze
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread