Re: Bug#780201: new codename needed for oldstable (due to squeeze-lts) when stable becomes oldstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:38:29 +0100
Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when jessie will be released, wheezy will become oldstable and we'll need a
> new alias for squeeze, as various tools internally work with aliases. (The
> security tracker comes to my mind, but also the Release files it seems. And
> probably more.)
>
> I believe it's the ftp teams duty / joy to decide this name and would like to
> ask you to do soon, so that various places can be prepared for the joyful day
> we release jessie.
>
> Current suggestions I've heard (and liked) are "oldoldstable" and
> "veryoldstable".
>
> I *dislike* "obsoletestable" and "stalestable" as they are either wrong
> (squeeze is not obsolete) or carry a bad connotation.
>
>
> cheers,
> Holger
What about 'extremely-stable' ??
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlT+7YsACgkQ5+rBHyUt5wswlQCgoTTsQR5jUK3Om45xcPsD2Fgp
HdcAoIPmig3g9GkHaezwK9ASpJJbn047
=cwuW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: