[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: security.debian.org vs debian-lts respository



On Dienstag, 17. Juni 2014, Evgeni Golov wrote:
No, please *extend* the list. Not replace it.
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using

If you remove squeeze and/or squeeze security, dependencies will become
unresolvable.

On 03.10.14 15:42, Holger Levsen wrote:
squeeze-security isn't needed, the last point release has happened and all
packages have been moved from there to squeeze proper.

Good, I have asked about this some time ago...

So only squeeze and squeeze-lts are needed.

I'm updating https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using to reflect this again.

What about squeeze-updates (formerly volatile)?
Are they still needed?
Are security fixes applied to packages in squeeze or squeeze-updates?

>btw, installing the debian-security-support package would also have told
>you that these packages are not supported anymore.</hint> :-)

On Samstag, 4. Oktober 2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I do have that one. well unfortunately it's not in wheezy yet.

On 04.10.14 10:12, Holger Levsen wrote:
there is a backport in wheezy-backports.

not the same, using backports is not necessary but having
debian-security-support would be nice in wheezy too.

Maybe it's time to ask release manager?

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges.
Reply to: