Hi, On Dienstag, 15. Juli 2014, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > I don't think we should impose restrictions on the format of the mails. I think we absolutly should. We want consistend announcements, don't we? > If > we want to welcome maintainers not part of the LTS team to take care of > packages in Debian LTS, we should not make this needlessly difficult. Sure! But I think we can do both. > Let's not mimick the existing security.debian.org infrastructure too much, > but rather have a look on how can create cleaner solutions from scratch > (and retrofit them into security.debian.org once they've proven > themselves): I also agree with this. > If IDs are important to people to have a specific identifier, we should > rather solve this technically: The script which checks the PGP signature > could simply increment the ID internally and rewrite the subject with [DLA > $ID]. This saves people from all hassle with allocating IDs and it's free > of race conditions in assigning IDs. listmasters, how feasible do you think it is? I'm all for automating the generation of proper announcements! (But I also think that we should use other means to achieve consisten announcements until we got there.) cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.