Re: Security support for adns in squeeze-lts
Moritz Mühlenhoff writes ("Re: Security support for adns in squeeze-lts"):
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 03:04:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I'm upstream for adns and I am keen to support it. I'm not aware of
> > any security problems with it.
> It's not in the "support ended", but rather in the "limited support"
> "adns Stub resolver that should only be used with trusted recursors"
I'm not sure exactly what this means. Is that string a description of
what way the support is `limited' ?
That sentence describes adns's design goal. So if that's the only
problem the situation in lts is no worse than stable.