Re: Re: Packages not supportable in squeeze-lts

[Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li>]

On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 09:43:20AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Friday 16 May 2014 17:39:02 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> [...]
> > What could be done is to provide the wheezy kernel with the source package
> > name linux-3.2. This way it would benefit from all the security backports
> > done for wheezy-security.
> 
> I assume you meant just 'linux' here? There's no need to change the source 
> package name when backporting from wheezy.

My interpretation of what Moritz said is that this would be necessary
so we can have both the 2.6.32 derived kernel in squeeze-lts and
a backport of the wheezy kernel. They will serve different purposes
and should indeed coexist, which means they need different source
package names.

(and yes, this is much better than having a separate 'nhalf' kernel
as per my original suggestion).

Cheers,
Dominic.