[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gsl 2.6+dfsg-2+deb11u1 (source) into oldstable-security



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 18:35:36 +0200
Source: gsl
Architecture: source
Version: 2.6+dfsg-2+deb11u1
Distribution: bullseye-security
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
Changes:
 gsl (2.6+dfsg-2+deb11u1) bullseye-security; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload by the LTS Team.
   * CVE-2020-35357: buffer overflow when calculating the quantile value
   * Backport DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=pkg.gsl.prof change to tell dak that
     libgsl0-prof is not built by default, DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=pkg.gsl.prof
     is now available instead of DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=buildprof.
Checksums-Sha1:
 d3e44ec6f7814e2eafbdcf2beff6db3d208fdb86 2162 gsl_2.6+dfsg-2+deb11u1.dsc
 ba5337924f855d8ca35244e4e9d46dec87283b1e 6825220 gsl_2.6+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
 08b16a091430d4c39a0349712dc84af907690c83 21284 gsl_2.6+dfsg-2+deb11u1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 0d8ecf93c23fcf413d645ca9a3ee44835654a75110b14a8d772dceb45a760c65 2162 gsl_2.6+dfsg-2+deb11u1.dsc
 012d611d9b565fe3d8e598fc93f38df8a12175669277dbe8c575877a03144712 6825220 gsl_2.6+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
 fc9deb97619f0d5fdbcfddf76a179b84860d706aecdf6328e2db9e21199ae55b 21284 gsl_2.6+dfsg-2+deb11u1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 3b203ad38e4c6a1b8d369393a6f8d88d 2162 math optional gsl_2.6+dfsg-2+deb11u1.dsc
 12cafde515756ba0a9666dea52b72f84 6825220 math optional gsl_2.6+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
 93eacb48f36119e9e379cf87ed885a8b 21284 math optional gsl_2.6+dfsg-2+deb11u1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=9PMW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpoM4jHgb__r.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: