Accepted haproxy 1.8.19-1+deb10u4 (source) into oldstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 18:32:03 CET
Source: haproxy
Architecture: source
Version: 1.8.19-1+deb10u4
Distribution: buster-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian HAProxy Maintainers <haproxy@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>
Checksums-Sha1:
5d3a371cd0d30ab4b528b06a2699adb838fc19b5 2445 haproxy_1.8.19-1+deb10u4.dsc
c41fc9969eb072a92d9f6b5d0aeeaaa7f8573f19 73436 haproxy_1.8.19-1+deb10u4.debian.tar.xz
416f911f07f5b886b749fd6d95a83ae0e746b60e 8863 haproxy_1.8.19-1+deb10u4_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
9b1a8bdafa2620b7394fab1b077e5844051cb3526c0188268c5c4f1c78687f96 2445 haproxy_1.8.19-1+deb10u4.dsc
6111a6124361a4a54ccc2bd80d4d658990e37135bfd0f8514624b482eb0b9544 73436 haproxy_1.8.19-1+deb10u4.debian.tar.xz
a5a67781f627c794268a4d3777650e5bc0b609aba3f89e731e9f397d1c502c34 8863 haproxy_1.8.19-1+deb10u4_amd64.buildinfo
Changes:
haproxy (1.8.19-1+deb10u4) buster-security; urgency=high
.
* Non-maintainer upload by the LTS team.
* Fix CVE-2023-25725:
A security vulnerability was discovered in HAProxy, a fast and reliable
load balancing reverse proxy, which may result in denial of service, or
bypass of access controls and routing rules via specially crafted requests.
Files:
a4bafc8176acfdfe29857b6cef1cf2a4 2445 net optional haproxy_1.8.19-1+deb10u4.dsc
a07f1db5212b41482e6862dc8c6965e2 73436 net optional haproxy_1.8.19-1+deb10u4.debian.tar.xz
f47d3ede9b7a95509fee2fc1981abbe3 8863 net optional haproxy_1.8.19-1+deb10u4_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=SpJb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: