[SECURITY] [DLA 3632-1] firefox-esr security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3632-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
October 27, 2023 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : firefox-esr
Version : 115.4.0esr-1~deb10u1
CVE ID : CVE-2023-5721 CVE-2023-5724 CVE-2023-5725 CVE-2023-5728
CVE-2023-5730 CVE-2023-5732
Multiple security issues have been found in the Mozilla Firefox web
browser, which could potentially result in the execution of arbitrary
code, clickjacking, spoofing or information leaks.
For Debian 10 buster, these problems have been fixed in version
115.4.0esr-1~deb10u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your firefox-esr packages.
For the detailed security status of firefox-esr please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/firefox-esr
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Zpgp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: