[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 3450-1] ruby2.5 security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3450-1              debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/                      Utkarsh Gupta
June 09, 2023                               https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : ruby2.5
Version        : 2.5.5-3+deb10u6
CVE ID         : CVE-2021-33621 CVE-2022-28739
Debian Bug     : 1009957 1024800 1037178

A couple of security issues were discovered in ruby2.5, the Ruby
interpreter, and are as follows -

CVE-2021-33621

    Hiroshi Tokumaru discovered that Ruby did not properly handle
    certain user input for applications the generate HTTP responses
    using cgi gem. An attacker could possibly use this issue to
    maliciously modify the response a user would receive from a
    vulnerable application.

CVE-2022-28739

    It was discovered that Ruby incorrectly handled certain inputs.
    An attacker could possibly use this issue to expose sensitive
    information.

For Debian 10 buster, these problems have been fixed, along with the
regressions caused by the last Ruby update, in version 2.5.5-3+deb10u6.

We recommend that you upgrade your ruby2.5 packages.

For the detailed security status of ruby2.5 please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/ruby2.5

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=C331
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: